Sorrells v. . Decker

193 S.E. 14, 212 N.C. 251, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 288

• Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
• Decided: October 13, 1937
• Status: Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe only exceptions noted at tbe trial and brought forward in tbe assignments of error relate to tbe judge’s charge to tbe jury. Tbe portions excepted to contained statements of tbe contentions of tbe parties and tbe evidence supporting. If there were any inadvertence on tbe part of tbe judge in these recitals, bis attention should have been called to it at tbe time so that correction, if deemed important, might have been made. S. v. Sinodis, 189 N. C., 565; S. v. Barnhill, 186 N. C., 446. Tbe controversy presented issues of fact which have been resolved against tbe defendant.

, In tbe trial, we find

No error.

WiNBOENE, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case.