Sorrells v. . Decker

193 S.E. 14, 212 N.C. 251, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 288
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 13, 1937·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe only exceptions noted at tbe trial and brought forward in tbe assignments of error relate to tbe judge’s charge to tbe jury. Tbe portions excepted to contained statements of tbe contentions of tbe parties and tbe evidence supporting. If there were any inadvertence on tbe part of tbe judge in these recitals, bis attention should have been called to it at tbe time so that correction, if deemed important, might have been made. S. v. Sinodis, 189 N. C., 565; S. v. Barnhill, 186 N. C., 446. Tbe controversy presented issues of fact which have been resolved against tbe defendant.

, In tbe trial, we find

No error.

WiNBOENE, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sorrells v. . Decker, 193 S.E. 14, 212 N.C. 251, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 288 (N.C. 1937).

193 S.E. 14 (Sorrells v. . Decker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steelman v. . Benfield
46 S.E.2d 829 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Bailey v. Hayman
220 N.C. 402 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
Brittain v. . R. R.
9 S.E.2d 416 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Brittain v. Atlantic & Yadkin Railway Co.
217 N.C. 737 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
State v. . Bowser
199 S.E. 31 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Acceptance Corp. v. . Edwards
197 S.E. 613 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Edwards
213 N.C. 736 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
State v. . Proctor
195 S.E. 816 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)