Sorce v. Sorce

16 A.D.3d 1077, 793 N.Y.S.2d 304, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2813
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 18, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 16 A.D.3d 1077 (Sorce v. Sorce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sorce v. Sorce, 16 A.D.3d 1077, 793 N.Y.S.2d 304, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Joseph D. Valentino, J.), entered January 27, 2004 in a divorce action. The order, among other things, awarded sole custody of the parties’ children to plaintiff, exclusive use and occupancy of the marital residence to plaintiff, and visitation to defendant, and provided that each party is solely responsible for his or her own counsel fees.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the last ordering paragraph and as modified the order is affirmed without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in awarding plaintiff sole custody of the parties’ minor children with liberal visitation to defendant. “A custody determination by the trial court must be accorded great deference and should not be disturbed where, as here, it is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record” (Matter of Green v Mitchell, 266 AD2d 884, 884 [1999] [citations omitted]). The court erred, however, in denying counsel fees on this record (see Price v Price, 113 AD2d 299, 309 [1985], affd 69 NY2d 8 [1986]). We therefore modify the order by vacating the last ordering [1078]*1078paragraph, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court for a hearing on counsel fees. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Robert L. v. Jefferson County Dept. of Social Servs.
2022 NY Slip Op 01913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Angel M.S. v. Thomas J.S.
41 A.D.3d 1227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Charles K. v. Emily A.A.
38 A.D.3d 1249 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Wideman v. Wideman
38 A.D.3d 1318 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Amy L.W. v. Brendan K.H.
37 A.D.3d 1060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Lewis R.E. v. Deloris A.E.
37 A.D.3d 1092 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Richard C.T. v. Helen R.G.
37 A.D.3d 1118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Carl G. v. Oneida County Department of Social Services
24 A.D.3d 1274 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Barbato v. Proskurenko
21 A.D.3d 1351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Longo v. Wright
19 A.D.3d 1078 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 A.D.3d 1077, 793 N.Y.S.2d 304, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sorce-v-sorce-nyappdiv-2005.