Barbato v. Proskurenko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barbato v. Proskurenko

21 A.D.3d 1351, 801 N.Y.S.2d 183

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 2005

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.3d 1351 (Barbato v. Proskurenko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barbato v. Proskurenko, 21 A.D.3d 1351, 801 N.Y.S.2d 183 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (David G. Klim, J.), entered July 22, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded primary residential custody of the parties’ child to respondent and visitation to petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051 [1990]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (David G. Klim, J.), entered July 22, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded primary residential custody of the parties’ child to respondent and visitation to petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051 [1990]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.3d 1351, 801 N.Y.S.2d 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barbato-v-proskurenko-nyappdiv-2005.