Barbato v. Proskurenko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barbato v. Proskurenko

21 A.D.3d 1351, 801 N.Y.S.2d 183

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2005·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (David G. Klim, J.), entered July 22, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded primary residential custody of the parties’ child to respondent and visitation to petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051 [1990]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (David G. Klim, J.), entered July 22, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded primary residential custody of the parties’ child to respondent and visitation to petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051 [1990]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Barbato v. Proskurenko, 21 A.D.3d 1351, 801 N.Y.S.2d 183 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

21 A.D.3d 1351 (Barbato v. Proskurenko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.