Sopp v. State

84 So. 3d 395, 2012 WL 966636, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4572
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 23, 2012
Docket5D11-2341
StatusPublished

This text of 84 So. 3d 395 (Sopp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sopp v. State, 84 So. 3d 395, 2012 WL 966636, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4572 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tina Lynn Sopp appeals from judgments and sentences for possession of oxycodone, driving under the influence, providing a false name to a law enforcement officer, and driving while license suspended, challenging the denial of a dispositive motion to suppress evidence and challenging her drug possession conviction based upon the constitutional analysis in Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011).

We affirm as to the suppression issue without further comment, and reject the constitutional claim for the reasons expressed in Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We certify that the same issue reviewed in this case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 117 *396 (Fla.2011). The mandate will be withheld pending final disposition of Adkins.

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flagg v. State
74 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
71 So. 3d 117 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)
Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
802 F. Supp. 2d 1289 (M.D. Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 So. 3d 395, 2012 WL 966636, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sopp-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.