Sonnenberg v. Nolan Motors Inc.

2 Misc. 2d 185, 36 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1942 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1231
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided July 1, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff by his contract having waived any implied warranty, any recovery must be based only on a breach of the uniform warranty made part of the agreement. (Personal Property Law, § 152; Plimpton v. Brown Bros. Co., 224 N. Y. 724; Lumbrazo v. Woodruff, 256 N. Y. 92, 96; Lee v. Industrial Laundry Mach. Co., 261 App. Div. 741; Sayeg v. Gloria Light Co., 236 App. Div. 761; 106 A. L. R. 1466.)

The order should be reversed, motion granted, with $30 costs to appellant against plaintiff to abide the event, and judgment vacated.

Hammer. Shientag and Miller, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sonnenberg v. Nolan Motors Inc., 2 Misc. 2d 185, 36 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1942 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1231 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

2 Misc. 2d 185 (Sonnenberg v. Nolan Motors Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broderick Haulage, Inc. v. MacK-international Motor Truck Corp.
1 A.D.2d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)