Sayeg v. Gloria Light Co.

236 A.D. 761
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant dismissing the complaint upon the merits, with costs. In our opinion, no warranty, either express or implied, could be established in this case because the contract itself expressly excludes all warranties. (Bowser & Co., Inc., v. McCormack, 230 App. Div. 303; Carleton v. Lombard, Ayres & Co., 149 N. Y. 137.) Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent with this decision are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made in accordance herewith. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sayeg v. Gloria Light Co., 236 A.D. 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

236 A.D. 761 (Sayeg v. Gloria Light Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shampine v. Fleming
280 A.D. 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Alaska Pacific Salmon Co. v. Reynolds Metals Co.
163 F.2d 643 (Second Circuit, 1947)
Sonnenberg v. Nolan Motors Inc.
2 Misc. 2d 185 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)