Song v. Turtil
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IEEHYUNGTHOMASSONG, Plaintiff, -against- 21 CIVIL 2269 (VB) JUDGMENT LAWRENCE C. TURTIL, Defendant. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 27, 2023, the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962); accordingly, the case 1s closed. Dated: New York, New York February 28, 2023
RUBY J. KRAJICK
Clerkof Court BY: HK (Mange Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Song v. Turtil (Song v. Turtil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.