Song v. Turtil

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 28, 2023·No. 7:21-cv-02269·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IEEHYUNGTHOMASSONG, Plaintiff, -against- 21 CIVIL 2269 (VB) JUDGMENT LAWRENCE C. TURTIL, Defendant. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 27, 2023, the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962); accordingly, the case 1s closed. Dated: New York, New York February 28, 2023

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerkof Court BY: HK (Mange Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Song v. Turtil, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Song v. Turtil (Song v. Turtil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)