Somogyi v. Nevai

920 So. 2d 828, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2280, 2006 WL 398619
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 22, 2006·No. No. 4D05-3234·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The “Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Petition for Revocation of Portions of Will and [829]*829Related Relief’ does not finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person under Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(a)(2), where it merely denies a motion to dismiss and does not revoke the probate of the will. See Sanchez v. Masterhan, 837 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Dismissed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Somogyi v. Nevai, 920 So. 2d 828, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2280, 2006 WL 398619 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

920 So. 2d 828 (Somogyi v. Nevai) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Governor of Florida ex rel. Hall
23 So. 3d 779 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)