Somogyi v. Nevai

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Somogyi v. Nevai

920 So. 2d 828, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2280, 2006 WL 398619

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 22, 2006

DocketNo. 4D05-3234

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 920 So. 2d 828 (Somogyi v. Nevai) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Somogyi v. Nevai, 920 So. 2d 828, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2280, 2006 WL 398619 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The “Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Petition for Revocation of Portions of Will and [829]*829Related Relief’ does not finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person under Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(a)(2), where it merely denies a motion to dismiss and does not revoke the probate of the will. See Sanchez v. Masterhan, 837 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Dismissed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The “Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Petition for Revocation of Portions of Will and [829]*829Related Relief’ does not finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person under Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(a)(2), where it merely denies a motion to dismiss and does not revoke the probate of the will. See Sanchez v. Masterhan, 837 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Dismissed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

920 So. 2d 828, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2280, 2006 WL 398619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/somogyi-v-nevai-fladistctapp-2006.