Sanchez v. Masterhan

837 So. 2d 1161, 2003 WL 367057
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2003·No. 1D02-4652·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

837 So.2d 1161 (2003)

Maria H. SANCHEZ, as Personal Representative, Appellant,
v.
Albert Fenton MASTERHAN, Doris King, Appellee.

No. 1D02-4652.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2003.

Theodore M. Burt, Trenton, for Appellant.

Peter C.K. Enwall, Gainesville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant's response to this Court's order, dated December 17, 2002, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, Order on Motion to Dismiss Supplemental Petition for Revocation of Probate of Will, dated October 15, 2002, does not "finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person," Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(a)(2) (emphasis added), where it merely denies a motion to dismiss, and does not revoke the probate of the will. The appellant's January 14, 2002, Motion for Thirty Day Extension of Time to File Appellants' Initial Brief, is denied as moot.

DISMISSED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanchez v. Masterhan, 837 So. 2d 1161, 2003 WL 367057 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

837 So. 2d 1161 (Sanchez v. Masterhan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Governor of Florida ex rel. Hall
23 So. 3d 779 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Edelstein v. BEAGELL
7 So. 3d 564 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Somogyi v. Nevai
920 So. 2d 828 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)