Sanchez v. Masterhan
This text of 837 So. 2d 1161 (Sanchez v. Masterhan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Maria H. SANCHEZ, as Personal Representative, Appellant,
v.
Albert Fenton MASTERHAN, Doris King, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Theodore M. Burt, Trenton, for Appellant.
Peter C.K. Enwall, Gainesville, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellant's response to this Court's order, dated December 17, 2002, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, Order on Motion to Dismiss Supplemental Petition for Revocation of Probate of Will, dated October 15, 2002, does not "finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person," Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(a)(2) (emphasis added), where it merely denies a motion to dismiss, and does not revoke the probate of the will. The appellant's January 14, 2002, Motion for Thirty Day Extension of Time to File Appellants' Initial Brief, is denied as moot.
DISMISSED.
WEBSTER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
837 So. 2d 1161, 2003 WL 367057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-masterhan-fladistctapp-2003.