Somogye v. Somogye

167 A.D.2d 873, 562 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14431
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 1990·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in terminating Mr. Somogye’s obligations to pay maintenance and utility expenses for the marital residence. Under a stipulation, those obligations were to continue only until Mrs. Somogye completed a course as a court stenographer and became fully employed. Since Mrs. Somogye quit the course before completing it, she prevented the occurrence of the condition upon which her husband’s obligations would cease. Family Court also properly denied Mrs. Somogye’s petition for upward modification of child support because she failed to establish that there had been a substantial change of circumstances (see, Matter of Boden v Boden, 42 NY2d 210) or that the children’s needs are not being met (see, Matter of Brescia v Fitts, 56 NY2d 132). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Sedita, Jr., J.—modify maintenance.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Somogye v. Somogye, 167 A.D.2d 873, 562 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14431 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

167 A.D.2d 873 (Somogye v. Somogye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Somogye v. Somogye
167 A.D.2d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)