Solomon v. Liberty County

Eleventh Circuit

Solomon v. Liberty County

873 F.2d 248

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedApril 26, 1989

DocketNo. 87-3406

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 873 F.2d 248 (Solomon v. Liberty County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solomon v. Liberty County, 873 F.2d 248 (11th Cir. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion December 12, 1988, 11th Cir., 1988, 865 F.2d 1566.)

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of June 5, 1989, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion December 12, 1988, 11th Cir., 1988, 865 F.2d 1566.)

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of June 5, 1989, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Greg Solomon, Patricia Beckwith, Raleigh Brinson, and Earl Jennings, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Liberty County, Florida, Gene Free, Chairman, Commissioner, Joe Burke, Commissioner, James E. Johnson, Commissioner, J.L. Johnson, Commissioner, John T. Sanders, Commissioner, Their Successors and Agents, All in Their Official Capacities, Gregory Solomon, Patricia Beckwith, Raleigh Brinson and Earl Jennings, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Liberty County School Board, Florida, Ras Hill, Chairman, Joseph Combs, Tommy Duggar, W.L. Potter, Herbert Whittaker, Members of the Liberty County School Board, Their Successors and Agents, All in Their Official Capacities

873 F.2d 248 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

873 F.2d 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-liberty-county-ca11-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack