Solomon v. Abercrombie

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 4, 2012
DocketSCPW-11-0000732
StatusPublished

This text of Solomon v. Abercrombie (Solomon v. Abercrombie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. Abercrombie, (haw 2012).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-11-0000732 04-JAN-2012 03:00 PM

NO. SCPW-11-0000732

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

MALAMA SOLOMON, STATE SENATOR, 1ST SENATORIAL DISTRICT; LOUIS HAO; PATRICIA A. COOK; and STEVEN G. PAVAO, Petitioners,

vs.

NEIL ABERCROMBIE, GOVERNOR, STATE OF HAWAI#I; SCOTT NAGO, CHIEF ELECTION OFFICER, STATE OF HAWAI#I; STATE OF HAWAI#I 2011 REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION; VICTORIA MARKS; LORRIE LEE STONE; ANTHONY TAKITANI; CALVERT CHIPCHASE IV; ELIZABETH MOORE; CLARICE Y. HASHIMOTO; HAROLD S. MASUMOTO; DYLAN NONAKA; and TERRY E. THOMASON, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of

mandamus and judicial review filed by petitioners Malama Solomon,

Louis Hao, Patricia A. Cook and Steven G. Pavao, the answers by

respondent Governor Neil Abercrombie, the Chief Election Officer,

and the 2011 State of Hawai#i Reapportionment Commission, and

oral argument, we conclude that the 2011 Final Reapportionment

Plan is constitutionally invalid. The Hawai#i Constitution,

article IV, section 4, expressly mandates that only permanent residents be counted in the population base for the purpose of

reapportionment. The 2011 Final Reapportionment Plan disregards

this constitutional mandate by including non-permanent residents

in the population base that the Reapportionment Commission used

to allocate the members of the state legislature among the basic

island units. Therefore, pursuant to our power under the Hawai#i

Constitution, article IV, section 10, to correct any error in a

reapportionment plan,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus and judicial review is granted. The 2011 Final

Reapportionment Plan for the state legislature is hereby

invalidated. The 2011 State of Hawai#i Reapportionment

Commission shall prepare and file a new reapportionment plan

that: (1) allocates the members of the state legislature among

the basic island units by using a permanent resident population

base, and then (2) apportions the members among the districts

therein as provided by article IV, section 6. The Chief Election

Officer shall rescind the publication of the 2011 Final

Reapportionment Plan for the state legislature. An opinion will

follow.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 4, 2012.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Solomon v. Abercrombie, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-abercrombie-haw-2012.