Solares v. Diaz

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 8, 2024·No. 1:20-cv-00323·Unknown

Opinion

1 ROB BONTA, State Bar No. 202668 Attorney General of California 2 JON S. ALLIN, State Bar No. 155069 Supervising Deputy Attorney General 3 JEREMY DUGGAN, State Bar No. 229854 Deputy Attorney General 4 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 5 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 210-6008 6 Fax: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Jeremy.Duggan@doj.ca.gov 7 Attorneys for Defendant J. Burnes 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 13 DORA SOLARES, 1:20-CV-00323-JLT-BAM 14 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 15 v. Action Filed: March 2, 2020 16 RALPH DIAZ, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 To facilitate discovery in this matter, Plaintiff Dora Solares and Defendant Burnes, 21 stipulate that all information, testimony, documents, or things produced or given (by a party or by 22 a non-party) as part of discovery in this action shall be governed by this Stipulated Protective 23 Order, which designates certain material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – 24 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 25 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 26 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 27 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 28 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 1 Accordingly, the parties stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated 2 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on 3 all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 4 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 5 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 6 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential 7 information under seal; Eastern District Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be 8 followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to 9 file material under seal. 10 2. DEFINITIONS 11 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 12 information or items under this Order. 13 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 14 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 15 of Civil Procedure 26(c). 16 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items: 17 extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another Party or 18 Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less 19 restrictive means. The criteria for such designation shall be whether the Party has a good-faith 20 belief that the information is entitled to protection from disclosure to non-attorneys, because such 21 information threatens the safety of individuals or inmates, or threatens the safety and security of a 22 prison. 23 2.4 Counsel (without qualifier): Counsel of Record (as well as their support staff). 24 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that 25 it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 26 “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 27 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 28 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 1 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 2 responses to discovery in this matter. 3 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 4 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 5 consultant in this action. 6 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 7 entity not named as a Party to this action. 8 2.9 Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but 9 are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf 10 of that party or are affiliated with a law firm or government agency which has appeared on behalf 11 of that party. 12 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 13 consultants, retained experts, and Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 14 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 15 Material in this action. 16 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 17 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 18 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 19 subcontractors. 20 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 21 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 22 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 23 Producing Party. 24 3. SCOPE 25 The protections conferred by this Stipulated Protective Order cover not only Protected 26 Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected 27 Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any 28 testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected 1 Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulated Protective Order do not cover the 2 following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to 3 a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as 4 a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the 5 public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party 6 prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who 7 obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating 8 Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 9 4. DURATION 10 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by 11 this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court 12 order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all 13 claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after 14 the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 15 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 16 applicable law. 17 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 18 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 19 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this 20 Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the 21 appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of 22 material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify so that other portions 23 of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are 24 not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 25 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Solares v. Diaz, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Solares v. Diaz (Solares v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)