Soland v. State

608 So. 2d 555, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12021, 1992 WL 336027
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 1992·No. No. 92-2785·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for relief under rule [556]*5563.850, and remand with instructions to the trial court to vacate appellant’s conviction and sentence and afford him a new trial. See Wright v. State, 604 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Soland v. State, 608 So. 2d 555, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12021, 1992 WL 336027 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

608 So. 2d 555 (Soland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Angomas v. State
611 So. 2d 623 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)