Angomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Angomas v. State

611 So. 2d 623, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1335, 1993 WL 15596

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 27, 1993

DocketNo. 92-3424

StatusPublished

This text of 611 So. 2d 623 (Angomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Angomas v. State, 611 So. 2d 623, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1335, 1993 WL 15596 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

LETTS, Judge.

The state concedes that we must grant the writ of habeas corpus in this case. In fact, we have already required that two of the appellant’s codefendants receive new trials on exactly the same issue. See Soland v. State, 608 So.2d 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Charles v. State, 565 So.2d 871 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Accordingly, and without further elaboration, we grant the writ, vacate the appellant’s conviction and sentence, and remand for a new trial.

PETITION GRANTED.

ANSTEAD and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI