Angomas v. State
611 So. 2d 623, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1335, 1993 WL 15596
Opinion
The state concedes that we must grant the writ of habeas corpus in this case. In fact, we have already required that two of the appellant’s codefendants receive new trials on exactly the same issue. See Soland v. State, 608 So.2d 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Charles v. State, 565 So.2d 871 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
Accordingly, and without further elaboration, we grant the writ, vacate the appellant’s conviction and sentence, and remand for a new trial.
PETITION GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Angomas v. State, 611 So. 2d 623, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1335, 1993 WL 15596 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
611 So. 2d 623 (Angomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Charles v. State
565 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Soland v. State
608 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)