Sokol v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sokol v. State

421 So. 2d 1116, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28201

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 17, 1982

DocketNo. 81-2619

StatusPublished

This text of 421 So. 2d 1116 (Sokol v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sokol v. State, 421 So. 2d 1116, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28201 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although appellant raised three points on appeal, only one has merit. The trial court incorrectly assessed court costs against appellant. That portion of the judgment or[1117]*1117dering appellant to pay $1,987.00 is stricken because appellant was insolvent at the time of sentencing. Ortiz v. State, 420 So.2d 923 (Fla.2d DCA 1982); Brown v. State, 400 So.2d 510 (Fla.2d DCA 1981); Engle v. State, 407 So.2d 641 (Fla.2d DCA 1981). Otherwise, we affirm the judgment and sentence.

OTT, C.J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although appellant raised three points on appeal, only one has merit. The trial court incorrectly assessed court costs against appellant. That portion of the judgment or[1117]*1117dering appellant to pay $1,987.00 is stricken because appellant was insolvent at the time of sentencing. Ortiz v. State, 420 So.2d 923 (Fla.2d DCA 1982); Brown v. State, 400 So.2d 510 (Fla.2d DCA 1981); Engle v. State, 407 So.2d 641 (Fla.2d DCA 1981). Otherwise, we affirm the judgment and sentence.

OTT, C.J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 So. 2d 1116, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sokol-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack