Sokol v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sokol v. State

421 So. 2d 1116, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28201

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1982·No. No. 81-2619·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although appellant raised three points on appeal, only one has merit. The trial court incorrectly assessed court costs against appellant. That portion of the judgment or[1117] dering appellant to pay $1,987.00 is stricken because appellant was insolvent at the time of sentencing. Ortiz v. State, 420 So.2d 923 (Fla.2d DCA 1982); Brown v. State, 400 So.2d 510 (Fla.2d DCA 1981); Engle v. State, 407 So.2d 641 (Fla.2d DCA 1981). Otherwise, we affirm the judgment and sentence.

OTT, C.J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although appellant raised three points on appeal, only one has merit. The trial court incorrectly assessed court costs against appellant. That portion of the judgment or[1117] dering appellant to pay $1,987.00 is stricken because appellant was insolvent at the time of sentencing. Ortiz v. State, 420 So.2d 923 (Fla.2d DCA 1982); Brown v. State, 400 So.2d 510 (Fla.2d DCA 1981); Engle v. State, 407 So.2d 641 (Fla.2d DCA 1981). Otherwise, we affirm the judgment and sentence.

OTT, C.J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Sokol v. State, 421 So. 2d 1116, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28201 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

421 So. 2d 1116 (Sokol v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related