Ortiz v. State
This text of 420 So. 2d 923 (Ortiz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Alfredo ORTIZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
*924 Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ann G. Paschall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal in this case, we find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error, and therefore the judgments and sentences appealed from are affirmed. However, that portion of the judgment ordering the appellant to pay court costs totaling $740 and $10 to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund is stricken because the appellant was insolvent at the time of sentencing. Ivory v. State, 419 So.2d 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Brown v. State, 400 So.2d 510 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Engle v. State, 407 So.2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 So. 2d 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.