Sohm v. Winegar

565 P.2d 1134, 1977 Utah LEXIS 1181
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedJune 17, 1977
DocketNo. 14654
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 565 P.2d 1134 (Sohm v. Winegar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sohm v. Winegar, 565 P.2d 1134, 1977 Utah LEXIS 1181 (Utah 1977).

Opinion

WILKINS, Justice:

Plaintiff, an attorney at law sued defendant, his client, to recover attorney’s fees, alleging that the parties had an agreement that the plaintiff would be paid a contingency fee of one fourth of the amount recovered on two cases and an hourly fee on a third case. At a trial on the merits, the District Court of Salt Lake County, sitting without a jury, found that there was never a meeting of the minds concerning the contingency contract that the defendant had agreed to pay reasonable attorneys’ fees, and further, that the plaintiffs had already received reasonable attorneys’ fees for his services. Plaintiff appeals.

There is substantial evidence to support the Court’s findings and judgment when viewed in the light most favorable to the [1135]*1135prevailing party,1 and the judgment is affirmed. Costs to respondent.

ELLETT, C. J., and CROCKETT, MAU-GHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sharpe v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
671 P.2d 185 (Utah Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
565 P.2d 1134, 1977 Utah LEXIS 1181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sohm-v-winegar-utah-1977.