Soderquist v. Fremont County, Idaho

Ninth Circuit

Soderquist v. Fremont County, Idaho

883 F.2d 1024, 1989 WL 95447

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 11, 1989

Docket36-3_19

StatusUnpublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 883 F.2d 1024 (Soderquist v. Fremont County, Idaho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Soderquist v. Fremont County, Idaho, 883 F.2d 1024, 1989 WL 95447 (9th Cir. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

883 F.2d 1024

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Lyle R. SODERQUIST, Krista Soderquist, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
FREMONT COUNTY, IDAHO, Terry Thompson, Bert C. Bates, Kurt
Hillman, Brian Loske, Keith Saurey, Kim Saurey,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-3509.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 3, 1989.
Decided Aug. 11, 1989.

Marion J. Callister, District Judge, Presiding.

Before KOELSCH, ALARCON and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Having thoroughly and carefully reviewed this matter, we adopt as the opinion of this court the Memorandum Opinion of the United States District Court of the District of Idaho dated October 8, 1987 and December 16, 1987.

So ordered.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI