Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale v. United States District Court For The District Of Alaska
This text of 823 F.2d 382 (Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale v. United States District Court For The District Of Alaska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SOCIETE NATIONALE INDUSTRIELLE AEROSPATIALE, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF ALASKA, Respondent,
and
Sharon Griffis, Personal Representative of the Estate of
Daniel D. Doran, Deceased, Real Party In Interest.
No. 85-7556.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 31, 1987.
Lillick, McHose & Charles and Stephen C. Johnson, San Francisco, Cal.; Rice, Hoppner, Brown & Brunner and Patrick T. Brown, Fairbanks, Alaska, for petitioner.
Young & Sanders and Joseph L. Young, Anchorage, Alaska, for real party in interest.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of Alaska; James A. Von Der Heydt, Judge.
Before ANDERSON, SKOPIL and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.ORDER
During the pendency of petitioner's request for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc, the parties have advised the court that the matter has been settled. In light of that settlement, we dismiss the appeal as moot. Our prior opinion, reported at 788 F.2d 1408, is hereby vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
823 F.2d 382, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/societe-nationale-industrielle-aerospatiale-v-united-states-district-court-ca9-1987.