Sobol v. Planning & Zoning Commission

262 A.2d 185, 158 Conn. 623
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 13, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 262 A.2d 185 (Sobol v. Planning & Zoning Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sobol v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 262 A.2d 185, 158 Conn. 623 (Colo. 1969).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court substituted its judgment for that of the defendant commission. It had no authority to do so. Belknap v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 155 Conn. 380, 384, 232 A.2d 922, and cases cited; see Hawkes v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission, 156 Conn. 207, 240 A.2d 914.

There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to dismiss the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Housatonic Terminal Corp. v. Planning & Zoning Board
362 A.2d 1375 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1975)
Horvath v. Zoning Board of Appeals
316 A.2d 418 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1972)
Clapp v. South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission
290 A.2d 326 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1971)
Kish v. Planning & Zoning Board
267 A.2d 442 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.2d 185, 158 Conn. 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sobol-v-planning-zoning-commission-conn-1969.