Kish v. Planning & Zoning Board
This text of 267 A.2d 442 (Kish v. Planning & Zoning Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court erred in substituting its judgment for that of the defendant board. Sobol v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 158 Conn. 623, 262 A.2d 185; Belknap v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 155 Conn. 380, 384, 232 A.2d 922, and cases cited; see Hawkes v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission, 156 Conn. 207, 240 A.2d 914.
There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to dismiss the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.2d 442, 159 Conn. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kish-v-planning-zoning-board-conn-1970.