Kish v. Planning & Zoning Board

267 A.2d 442, 159 Conn. 604
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 4, 1970·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court erred in substituting its judgment for that of the defendant board. Sobol v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 158 Conn. 623, 262 A.2d 185; Belknap v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 155 Conn. 380, 384, 232 A.2d 922, and cases cited; see Hawkes v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission, 156 Conn. 207, 240 A.2d 914.

There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to dismiss the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kish v. Planning & Zoning Board, 267 A.2d 442, 159 Conn. 604 (Colo. 1970).

267 A.2d 442 (Kish v. Planning & Zoning Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clapp v. South Windsor Planning & Zoning Commission
290 A.2d 326 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1971)