Snyder v. State

920 So. 2d 1281, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2819, 2006 WL 470604
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Snyder v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 870 So. 2d 140
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 2006·No. No. 4D05-4348·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Erick Snyder appeals from the summary denial of a rule 3.850 motion. We reverse and remand for the circuit court to consider appellant’s “Notice of Supplemental Authority to Successive Motion for Post-Conviction Relief’ as a supplement to the rule 3.850 motion. On remand, the court should address whether appellant is entitled to any relief based on Sult v. State, 906 So.2d 1013 (Fla.2005).

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snyder v. State, 920 So. 2d 1281, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2819, 2006 WL 470604 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

920 So. 2d 1281 (Snyder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sult v. State
906 So. 2d 1013 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)