Snyder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Snyder v. State

920 So. 2d 1281, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2819, 2006 WL 470604

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 2006

DocketNo. 4D05-4348

StatusPublished

This text of 920 So. 2d 1281 (Snyder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snyder v. State, 920 So. 2d 1281, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2819, 2006 WL 470604 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Erick Snyder appeals from the summary denial of a rule 3.850 motion. We reverse and remand for the circuit court to consider appellant’s “Notice of Supplemental Authority to Successive Motion for Post-Conviction Relief’ as a supplement to the rule 3.850 motion. On remand, the court should address whether appellant is entitled to any relief based on Sult v. State, 906 So.2d 1013 (Fla.2005).

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Erick Snyder appeals from the summary denial of a rule 3.850 motion. We reverse and remand for the circuit court to consider appellant’s “Notice of Supplemental Authority to Successive Motion for Post-Conviction Relief’ as a supplement to the rule 3.850 motion. On remand, the court should address whether appellant is entitled to any relief based on Sult v. State, 906 So.2d 1013 (Fla.2005).

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

920 So. 2d 1281, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2819, 2006 WL 470604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack