Snowden v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Snowden v. United States

93 F.2d 1016, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3704

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 11, 1938

DocketNo. 7338

StatusPublished

This text of 93 F.2d 1016 (Snowden v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snowden v. United States, 93 F.2d 1016, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3704 (6th Cir. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The law and facts of this cause having been submitted to the trial court without a jury, and the appellant not having made any request for specific findings of fact or law, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed on the authority of Rose v. United States, 6 Cir., 69 F.2d 966, Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas, 6 Cir., 30 F.2d 97, and Fleischmann Const. Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 46 S.Ct. 284, 70 L.Ed. 624.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The law and facts of this cause having been submitted to the trial court without a jury, and the appellant not having made any request for specific findings of fact or law, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed on the authority of Rose v. United States, 6 Cir., 69 F.2d 966, Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas, 6 Cir., 30 F.2d 97, and Fleischmann Const. Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 46 S.Ct. 284, 70 L.Ed. 624.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 F.2d 1016, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snowden-v-united-states-ca6-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack