Snow v. Howe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Snow v. Howe

253 A.D.2d 870, 678 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9871

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 253 A.D.2d 870 (Snow v. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Snow v. Howe, 253 A.D.2d 870, 678 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated September 18, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured when the minibus in which she was a passenger collided with an automobile operated by the defendant. It is undisputed that the driver of the minibus failed to yield the right-of-way to the defendant after stopping at a stop sign controlling traffic, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142 (a). The driver of the minibus acknowledged that he saw the defendant’s vehicle, but thought he “had enough room”. The defendant applied her brakes and turned her wheel to the left, but was unable to avoid impact.

[871]*871Clearly, the negligence of the driver of the minibus was the proximate cause of the collision (see, Bolta v Lohan, 242 AD2d 356; Nunziata v Birchell, 238 AD2d 555; Dellavecchia v Zorros, 231 AD2d 549; Salenius v Lisbon, 217 AD2d 692). There was no evidence that the defendant was negligent (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1113 [b]), and the defendant was therefor entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated September 18, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured when the minibus in which she was a passenger collided with an automobile operated by the defendant. It is undisputed that the driver of the minibus failed to yield the right-of-way to the defendant after stopping at a stop sign controlling traffic, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142 (a). The driver of the minibus acknowledged that he saw the defendant’s vehicle, but thought he “had enough room”. The defendant applied her brakes and turned her wheel to the left, but was unable to avoid impact.

[871]*871Clearly, the negligence of the driver of the minibus was the proximate cause of the collision (see, Bolta v Lohan, 242 AD2d 356; Nunziata v Birchell, 238 AD2d 555; Dellavecchia v Zorros, 231 AD2d 549; Salenius v Lisbon, 217 AD2d 692). There was no evidence that the defendant was negligent (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1113 [b]), and the defendant was therefor entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 870, 678 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snow-v-howe-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack