Salenius v. Lisbon

217 A.D.2d 692, 630 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8212
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 31, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 217 A.D.2d 692 (Salenius v. Lisbon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salenius v. Lisbon, 217 A.D.2d 692, 630 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8212 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated June 15, 1994, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in her favor on the issue of liability, an immediate [693]*693trial on the issue of damages, and dismissal of their sixth affirmative defense.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The internal accident report submitted by the plaintiff, in which the operator of the offending vehicle admitted that he had "run” a red light, made out a prima facie case that the defendants were solely liable for the accident (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). The only evidence submitted by the defendants in opposition to the motion was the deposition testimony of the plaintiff, which failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether she had been contributorily negligent in failing to exercise reasonable care in entering the intersection or in avoiding the collision (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arbizu v. REM Transportation, Inc.
20 A.D.3d 375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Iqbal v. Petrov
9 A.D.3d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Breslin v. Rudden
291 A.D.2d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
King v. Dalton
267 A.D.2d 208 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Hegy v. Coller
262 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Miranda v. Devlin
260 A.D.2d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Guerriero v. Timberlake
254 A.D.2d 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Diasparra v. Smith
253 A.D.2d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Snow v. Howe
253 A.D.2d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Bolta v. Lohan
242 A.D.2d 356 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Ferrara v. Maio
221 A.D.2d 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 A.D.2d 692, 630 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salenius-v-lisbon-nyappdiv-1995.