Snelson v. Snelson
This text of 440 So. 2d 477 (Snelson v. Snelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Alfred Francis SNELSON, Appellant,
v.
Mary A. SNELSON, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
John T. McKnight, Brunswick, Ga., for appellant.
W.B. Hunter, Tavares, for appellee.
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
ORFINGER, Chief Judge.
The notice of appeal was filed more than thirty days following rendition of the order appealed from, so we are without jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed.
Appellant's assertion that he was not furnished a copy of the order and thus did not have timely notice of its entry does not extend the jurisdictional time limit for appeal. Relief may be sought in the trial court by motion under Fla.R.C.P. 1.540(b) to set aside the order where no notice of its entry was given the parties, coupled with a request that a new order be entered so that the right of appeal is preserved. See Gibson v. Buice, 381 So.2d 349 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Woldarsky v. Woldarsky, 243 So.2d 629 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
DAUKSCH and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 So. 2d 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snelson-v-snelson-fladistctapp-1983.