Servamerica, Inc. v. Rood
This text of 440 So. 2d 477 (Servamerica, Inc. v. Rood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court granted specific performance requiring appellant to return to appellee his promissory note in exchange for certain certificates of corporate stock. Because the stock certificates had been issued with a restrictive legend concerning their transferability, the court ordered that appellee “do [478]*478anything further that may be necessary to get the certificates titled in the name of” appellant. We construe this language to mean that the return of the promissory note is conditioned upon the transfer of title to the stock. As so construed, we hereby affirm the final judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 So. 2d 477, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/servamerica-inc-v-rood-fladistctapp-1983.