Snelling v. McFadden

155 S.W.3d 768, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1801, 2004 WL 2660628
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 23, 2004·No. No. ED 84725·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling appeals from orders of the trial court granting defendants Larry T. and Eufabya McFadden’s, Bernice Evans’,1 and Albert Johnson’s motions to set aside default judgments entered against them and in favor of Snelling.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motions. Hinton v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., 99 S.W.3d 454, 458 (Mo.App. E.D.2003) (standard of review). No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snelling v. McFadden, 155 S.W.3d 768, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1801, 2004 WL 2660628 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

155 S.W.3d 768 (Snelling v. McFadden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lonnie Snelling v. Patrick J. Kenny
491 S.W.3d 606 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016)