Snelling v. McFadden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Snelling v. McFadden

196 S.W.3d 534, 2006 WL 997975

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 18, 2006·No. No. ED 86746·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing his lawsuit with prejudice for failure to prosecute. We affirm pursuant to 84.16(b).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing his lawsuit with prejudice for failure to prosecute. We affirm pursuant to 84.16(b).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value.

Snelling v. McFadden, 196 S.W.3d 534, 2006 WL 997975 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

196 S.W.3d 534 (Snelling v. McFadden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related