Snell v. Columbia Gun Exchange, Inc.

278 S.E.2d 333, 276 S.C. 301, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 374
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 13, 1981
Docket21451
StatusPublished
Cited by63 cases

This text of 278 S.E.2d 333 (Snell v. Columbia Gun Exchange, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snell v. Columbia Gun Exchange, Inc., 278 S.E.2d 333, 276 S.C. 301, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 374 (S.C. 1981).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from summary judgment granted to respondent. We affirm.

*303 Appellant brought action for personal injuries sustained on August 11, 1972, when a pistol which he had earlier purchased from the respondent accidentally discharged. The action was commenced by service of Summons and Complaint upon the respondent on December 20, 1978, six years and four months after the accidental shooting. Upon motion of the respondent, the court below granted summary judgment upon the ground that action was barred by Sections 15-3-530(5) and 15-3-535, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976. The former section establishes a six year limitation for actions arising from injury to the person and the latter section more specifically requires action to be commenced “within six years after the person knew or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known that he had a cause of action.”

Section 15-3-535 is of recent date and has not heretofore been construed by this Court. The exercise of reasonable diligence means simply that an injured party must act with some promptness where the facts and circumstances of an injury would put a person of common knowledge and experience on notice that some right of his has been invaded or that some claim against another party might exist. The statute of limitations begins to run from this point and not when advice of counsel is sought or a full-blown theory of recovery developed.

We have no difficulty in applying the language of Section 15-3-535 to the facts of this case. Where as here a pistol accidentally and unexplainably discharges causing injury, the injured party or his representative is thereby placed on notice that a defect in the weapon is possible. From that point on, reasonable diligence is required to determine if a cause of action may exist. Six years is ample time to discover any such cause, and failure to do so within the statutory period bars recovery in the absence of other legally recognized disabilities.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bierer and Associates, Inc. v. Jan F. Kennerly, Jr.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2025
R. Kent Porth v. Robert P. Wilkins, Jr.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2024
Stoppiello v. Turner
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021
Williams v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
353 F. Supp. 3d 432 (D. South Carolina, 2018)
McCoy v. North Charleston Police Department
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2018
Shipwatch Condominium v. Carolina Concrete
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2018
Church of God v. Mark Estes
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2018
Izzard v. City of Georgetown
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2013
Fisher v. Pelstring
817 F. Supp. 2d 791 (D. South Carolina, 2012)
Holmes v. National Service Industries, Inc.
717 S.E.2d 751 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2011)
Columbia Venture, LLC v. Dewberry & Davis, LLC
604 F.3d 824 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)
Holmes v. National Services Industries
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2009
Gibson v. Bank of America, N.A.
680 S.E.2d 778 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2009)
AMERICAN LEGION POST 15 v. Horry County
674 S.E.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2009)
Brown v. Leonard
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2008
Dinkins v. Winnsboro Petroleum
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2005
Epstein v. Brown
610 S.E.2d 816 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2005)
Dixon v. Dixon
608 S.E.2d 849 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 S.E.2d 333, 276 S.C. 301, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snell-v-columbia-gun-exchange-inc-sc-1981.