Sneed v. Jackson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sneed v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 F. App'x 654
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 10, 2007·No. 07-6652·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6652

COREY T. SNEED,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RICK JACKSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-hc-02099-BO)

Submitted: November 6, 2007 Decided: December 10, 2007

Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey T. Sneed, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Corey T. Sneed appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to resubmit his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Sneed v. Jackson, No. 5:06-hc-02099-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr.

10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sneed v. Jackson, (4th Cir. 2007).

Sneed v. Jackson (Sneed v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related