Sneed v. Jackson

Fourth Circuit

Sneed v. Jackson

257 F. App'x 654

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 10, 2007·No. No. 07-6652·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Corey T. Sneed appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to resubmit his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sneed v. Jackson, No. 5:06-he-02099-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Corey T. Sneed appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to resubmit his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sneed v. Jackson, No. 5:06-he-02099-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Sneed v. Jackson, 257 F. App'x 654 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

257 F. App'x 654 (Sneed v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related