Snarr Advertising, Inc. v. Sturgeon

Nevada Supreme Court

Snarr Advertising, Inc. v. Sturgeon

530 P.2d 762, 91 Nev. 11, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 529

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 16, 1975·No. No. 7541·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

We affirm the order of the district court granting a Rule 41 (b) dismissal since the appellant has not docketed with this court a transcript of the trial, nor a substitute therefor, and, we must, therefore, assume that the evidence supported the trial court’s implicit determinations. City of Las Vegas v. Bolden, 89 Nev. 526, 516 P.2d 110 (1973); Meakin v. Meakin, 88 Nev. 25, 492 P.2d 1304 (1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

We affirm the order of the district court granting a Rule 41 (b) dismissal since the appellant has not docketed with this court a transcript of the trial, nor a substitute therefor, and, we must, therefore, assume that the evidence supported the trial court’s implicit determinations. City of Las Vegas v. Bolden, 89 Nev. 526, 516 P.2d 110 (1973); Meakin v. Meakin, 88 Nev. 25, 492 P.2d 1304 (1972).

Snarr Advertising, Inc. v. Sturgeon, 530 P.2d 762, 91 Nev. 11, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 529 (Neb. 1975).

Pincite

530 P.2d 762 (Snarr Advertising, Inc. v. Sturgeon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related