Home/New York Court of Appeals/Smyth v. . the City of New York

Smyth v. . the City of New York

96 N.E. 415, 203 N.Y. 584, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 901
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 3, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 96 N.E. 415 (Smyth v. . the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smyth v. . the City of New York, 96 N.E. 415, 203 N.Y. 584, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 901 (N.Y. 1911).

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur by respondent City of New York. (See 203 N. Y. 106.)

Motion denied, without costs. Where an award of costs on appeal is made to several respondents, each respondent is entitled to tax his disbursements as part of the bill of costs, and on its payment each party is entitled to the amount of his disbursements as taxed and the allowance should be divided equally between all the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crawley v. Failla
173 N.E.2d 236 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
Producers Releasing Corporation De Cuba v. Pathe Industries, Inc
184 F.2d 1021 (Second Circuit, 1950)
Matter of City of New York
193 N.E. 339 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
Gardiner v. Automatic Arms Co.
275 F. 697 (N.D. New York, 1921)
In re City of New York
96 Misc. 42 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 N.E. 415, 203 N.Y. 584, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smyth-v-the-city-of-new-york-ny-1911.