Smyth v. . the City of New York

96 N.E. 415, 203 N.Y. 584, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 901
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 3, 1911·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur by respondent City of New York. (See 203 N. Y. 106.)

Motion denied, without costs. Where an award of costs on appeal is made to several respondents, each respondent is entitled to tax his disbursements as part of the bill of costs, and on its payment each party is entitled to the amount of his disbursements as taxed and the allowance should be divided equally between all the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smyth v. . the City of New York, 96 N.E. 415, 203 N.Y. 584, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 901 (N.Y. 1911).

96 N.E. 415 (Smyth v. . the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawley v. Failla
173 N.E.2d 236 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
Matter of City of New York
193 N.E. 339 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
Gardiner v. Automatic Arms Co.
275 F. 697 (N.D. New York, 1921)
In re City of New York
96 Misc. 42 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)