Crawley v. Failla
173 N.E.2d 236, 9 N.Y.2d 680
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur denied upon the ground that our remittitur, as it now reads, awards. one bill of costs against respondents employer and carrier and respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board. (See Smyth v. City of New York, 203 N. Y. 584.) [See 6 N Y 2d 57.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crawley v. Failla, 173 N.E.2d 236, 9 N.Y.2d 680 (N.Y. 1961).
173 N.E.2d 236 (Crawley v. Failla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smyth v. . the City of New York
96 N.E. 415 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)