Crawley v. Failla
173 N.E.2d 236, 9 N.Y.2d 680
This text of 173 N.E.2d 236 (Crawley v. Failla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crawley v. Failla, 173 N.E.2d 236, 9 N.Y.2d 680 (N.Y. 1961).
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur denied upon the ground that our remittitur, as it now reads, awards. one bill of costs against respondents employer and carrier and respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board. (See Smyth v. City of New York, 203 N. Y. 584.) [See 6 N Y 2d 57.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smyth v. . the City of New York
96 N.E. 415 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
173 N.E.2d 236, 9 N.Y.2d 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawley-v-failla-ny-1961.