Smoak v. State

105 So. 3d 611, 2013 WL 163314, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 574
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 16, 2013·No. No. 4D12-2059·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012); Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

POLEN, GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smoak v. State, 105 So. 3d 611, 2013 WL 163314, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 574 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

105 So. 3d 611 (Smoak v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maestas v. State
76 So. 3d 991 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
96 So. 3d 412 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)