Smithwick v. Colonial Pine Co.
154 S.E. 917, 199 N.C. 431, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 137
This text of 154 S.E. 917 (Smithwick v. Colonial Pine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smithwick v. Colonial Pine Co., 154 S.E. 917, 199 N.C. 431, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 137 (N.C. 1930).
Opinion
The judgment will be affirmed on authority of what was said in Lee v. Produce Co., 197 N. C., 714, 150 S. E., 363.
The case of Burgin v. R. R., 115 N. C., 673, 20 S. E., 473, strongly relied upon by the defendant, is easily distinguishable, the character of the allegations in the two complaints being quite different.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Scott v. Ætna Life Insurance
169 S.E. 801 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
154 S.E. 917, 199 N.C. 431, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smithwick-v-colonial-pine-co-nc-1930.