Smith Vsrv. Naphtaly
169 U.S. 365, 18 S. Ct. 946, 42 L. Ed. 779, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1500
Opinion
169 U.S. 365
18 S.Ct. 946
42 L.Ed. 779
SMITH vsrv. NAPHTALY.
No. 181.
February 28, 1898.
Henry F. Crane, for appellant.
A. T. Britton and A. R. Browne, for appellee.
Mr. Justice PECKHAM delivered the opinion of the court.
In this case counsel for the appellant concedes that if the court should hold that the sale of the land mentioned in the patent involved in the foregoing case (18 Sup. Ct. 354) were a valid sale, then the judgment in this case should be affirmed. As we do so hold, the judgment herein is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith Vsrv. Naphtaly, 169 U.S. 365, 18 S. Ct. 946, 42 L. Ed. 779, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1500 (1898).
169 U.S. 365 (Smith Vsrv. Naphtaly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Smith
49 S.W. 627 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1899)