Smith Vsrv. Naphtaly
This text of 169 U.S. 365 (Smith Vsrv. Naphtaly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
169 U.S. 365
18 S.Ct. 946
42 L.Ed. 779
SMITH vsrv. NAPHTALY.
No. 181.
February 28, 1898.
Henry F. Crane, for appellant.
A. T. Britton and A. R. Browne, for appellee.
Mr. Justice PECKHAM delivered the opinion of the court.
In this case counsel for the appellant concedes that if the court should hold that the sale of the land mentioned in the patent involved in the foregoing case (18 Sup. Ct. 354) were a valid sale, then the judgment in this case should be affirmed. As we do so hold, the judgment herein is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 U.S. 365, 18 S. Ct. 946, 42 L. Ed. 779, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-vsrv-naphtaly-scotus-1898.