Smith Vsrv. Naphtaly

169 U.S. 365, 18 S. Ct. 946, 42 L. Ed. 779, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1500
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 28, 1898·No. 181·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

169 U.S. 365

18 S.Ct. 946

42 L.Ed. 779

SMITH vsrv. NAPHTALY.

No. 181.

February 28, 1898.

Henry F. Crane, for appellant.

A. T. Britton and A. R. Browne, for appellee.

Mr. Justice PECKHAM delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case counsel for the appellant concedes that if the court should hold that the sale of the land mentioned in the patent involved in the foregoing case (18 Sup. Ct. 354) were a valid sale, then the judgment in this case should be affirmed. As we do so hold, the judgment herein is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith Vsrv. Naphtaly, 169 U.S. 365, 18 S. Ct. 946, 42 L. Ed. 779, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1500 (1898).

169 U.S. 365 (Smith Vsrv. Naphtaly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Smith
49 S.W. 627 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1899)