Smith Vsrv. Naphtaly

169 U.S. 365, 18 S. Ct. 946, 42 L. Ed. 779, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1500
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 28, 1898
Docket181
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 U.S. 365 (Smith Vsrv. Naphtaly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith Vsrv. Naphtaly, 169 U.S. 365, 18 S. Ct. 946, 42 L. Ed. 779, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1500 (1898).

Opinion

169 U.S. 365

18 S.Ct. 946

42 L.Ed. 779

SMITH vsrv. NAPHTALY.

No. 181.

February 28, 1898.

Henry F. Crane, for appellant.

A. T. Britton and A. R. Browne, for appellee.

Mr. Justice PECKHAM delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case counsel for the appellant concedes that if the court should hold that the sale of the land mentioned in the patent involved in the foregoing case (18 Sup. Ct. 354) were a valid sale, then the judgment in this case should be affirmed. As we do so hold, the judgment herein is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Smith
49 S.W. 627 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 U.S. 365, 18 S. Ct. 946, 42 L. Ed. 779, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-vsrv-naphtaly-scotus-1898.