Smith v. Willis
32 S.E. 92, 105 Ga. 840, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 747
Opinion
1. A “fast” writ of error will not lie to a refusal to dissolve an injunction. Armstrong v. Lewis, 48 Ga. 127; Ballin v. Ferst, 53 Ga. 551; Kaufman v. Ferst, 55 Ga. 350; Hollinshead v. Lincolnton, 84 Ga. 590.
2. This case having been improperly docketed to the present term of court, it is ordered, on the application of counsel for plaintiff in error, that it be transferred to the docket of the next term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Willis, 32 S.E. 92, 105 Ga. 840, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 747 (Ga. 1898).
32 S.E. 92 (Smith v. Willis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. Selman
136 S.E.2d 329 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Grizzel v. Grizzel
3 S.E.2d 649 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Jones v. Graham
1 S.E.2d 635 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
James v. Wilkerson
138 S.E. 71 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Berry v. Parker
61 S.E. 541 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Burwell
48 S.E. 145 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Hanson v. Stephens
42 S.E. 1028 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Loyd v. Webster
42 S.E. 1013 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Gordon v. Gordon
34 S.E. 324 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)