Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Smith v. Willis

Smith v. Willis

32 S.E. 92, 105 Ga. 840, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 747
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 32 S.E. 92 (Smith v. Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Willis, 32 S.E. 92, 105 Ga. 840, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 747 (Ga. 1898).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. A “fast” writ of error will not lie to a refusal to dissolve an injunction. Armstrong v. Lewis, 48 Ga. 127; Ballin v. Ferst, 53 Ga. 551; Kaufman v. Ferst, 55 Ga. 350; Hollinshead v. Lincolnton, 84 Ga. 590.

2. This case having been improperly docketed to the present term of court, it is ordered, on the application of counsel for plaintiff in error, that it be transferred to the docket of the next term.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Selman
136 S.E.2d 329 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Grizzel v. Grizzel
3 S.E.2d 649 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Jones v. Graham
1 S.E.2d 635 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
James v. Wilkerson
138 S.E. 71 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Berry v. Parker
61 S.E. 541 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Burwell
48 S.E. 145 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Hanson v. Stephens
42 S.E. 1028 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Loyd v. Webster
42 S.E. 1013 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Gordon v. Gordon
34 S.E. 324 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 S.E. 92, 105 Ga. 840, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-willis-ga-1898.