Loyd v. Webster

42 S.E. 1013, 116 Ga. 728, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 236
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 11, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Candeek, J.

1. The judgment oí a judge of the superior court in vacation, appointing trustees, can not be reviewed by this court upon a fast writ of error ,■ notwithstanding there was also in the petition a. prayer for injunction, it appearing that no action was taken by the court upon the application for injunction.

2. Under the ruling of this court in the case of Smith v. Willis, 105 Ga. 840, and upon application of counsel for the plaintiff in error, it is ordered that this case be transferred to the docket of the next term.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loyd v. Webster, 42 S.E. 1013, 116 Ga. 728, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 236 (Ga. 1902).

42 S.E. 1013 (Loyd v. Webster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James v. Wilkerson
138 S.E. 71 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)