Smith v. Waters, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary

201 F.2d 666, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2340
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 1953
Docket4565_1
StatusPublished

This text of 201 F.2d 666 (Smith v. Waters, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Waters, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, 201 F.2d 666, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2340 (10th Cir. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Smith, hereinafter called petitioner, was charged by information filed in the District Court of Kay County, Oklahoma, with a violation of Title 21, § 652, O.S.1941. He entered a plea of guilty to the information. The state court, erroneously believing that Title 21, § 42, O.S.1941 was applicable with respect to the sentence to be imposed, sentenced the petitioner for a term of 50 years. Petitioner was received at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary and seryed 6 years, 3 months, and 13 days under such sentence. He brought an original proceeding in habeas corpus in the Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma. That court held that the sentence imposed under Title 21, § 42, O.S.19'41 was void; that the proceedings up to the imposition of sentence were regular and valid and “in full force and effect” and remanded the petitioner to the District Court of Kay County, Oklahoma, for re-sentencing in accordance with the provisions of Title 21, § 652, O.S.1941. See Ex parte Smith, Okl.Cr.App., 246 P.2d 389. The District Court of Kay County sen *667 tenced petitioner to serve a term of four years in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary. Petitioner filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the court below. From an order denying the writ, petitioner has appealed.

The judgment is affirmed on authority of McCleary v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 124 F.2d 445, 447, and cases cited in note 4; United States v. Bozza, 3 Cir., 155 F.2d 592, 595; Id., 330 U.S. 160, 67 S.Ct. 645, 91 L.Ed. 818; Meyers v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 160 F.2d 344, 346; De Benque v. United States, 66 App.D.C. 36, 85 F.2d 202, 205-206, 106 A.L.R. 839.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bozza v. United States
330 U.S. 160 (Supreme Court, 1947)
Ex Parte Smith
1952 OK CR 81 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1952)
De Benque v. United States
85 F.2d 202 (D.C. Circuit, 1936)
McCleary v. Hudspeth
124 F.2d 445 (Tenth Circuit, 1941)
United States v. Bozza
155 F.2d 592 (Third Circuit, 1946)
Meyers v. Hunter
160 F.2d 344 (Tenth Circuit, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 F.2d 666, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-waters-warden-oklahoma-state-penitentiary-ca10-1953.