Smith v. United States
116 L. Ed. 2d 758, 112 S. Ct. 667, 502 U.S. 1017, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 7181, 60 U.S.L.W. 3434, 91 Daily Journal DAR 15425, 34 Fed. R. Serv. 30
Opinions
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Opinion of
respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari.
For the reasons stated in Justice Blackmun’s dissenting opinion, there is no escape from the conclusion that the Court of Appeals committed error in this case. I write only to note that I find it difficult to articulate an acceptable theory of discretionary review that would explain both the Court’s denial of certiorari in this case and its summary reversal in Mireles v. Waco, ante, p. 9 (per curiam), and Hunter v. Bryant, ante, p. 224 (per curiam).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. United States, 116 L. Ed. 2d 758, 112 S. Ct. 667, 502 U.S. 1017, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 7181, 60 U.S.L.W. 3434, 91 Daily Journal DAR 15425, 34 Fed. R. Serv. 30 (U.S. 1991).
116 L. Ed. 2d 758 (Smith v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hodge v. People
54 V.I. 786 (Virgin Islands, 2011)
United States v. Michael Andrew Hunter
19 F.3d 895 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Byron Perrymore Nelson, A/K/A Steve Stevenson, United States of America v. Donald Anthony Nelson, A/K/A Chris Stevenson, United States of America v. Talbert Wayne Morgan, A/K/A Troy Edwards Townes, A/K/A Troy Edwards
6 F.3d 1049 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Nelson
6 F.3d 1049 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
Douglas Williams, Jr. v. Gary T. Dixon, Warden Attorney General of North Carolina
961 F.2d 448 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)
Smith v. United States
502 U.S. 1017 (Supreme Court, 1991)