Smith v. Tumalo Irrigation District
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MATTHEW JAMES SMITH; PAUL CALLEN; DARREN PARKER; LYNN WARNER; KATHY POWELL; ANN CORKERY; ALLAN D. CLACK; KEVIN CORKERY; AND JBC RANCH PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiffs, Case No. 6:20-cv-00345-MK
v. ORDER TUMALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT; RONALD ALVARADO; and NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, Defendants.
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 120), and the matter is now before this Court on Plaintiffs’ objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.
1 -ORDER
Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 120) is adopted in full. The Federal Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment are DENIED. Plaintiffs’ federal claims are DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this __3_0_th__ day of October, 2023.
_______/_s/_M__ic_h_a_e_l_ M__c_S_h_a_n_e______ Michael McShane United States District Judge
2 –ORDER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Tumalo Irrigation District (Smith v. Tumalo Irrigation District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.