Smith v. Tumalo Irrigation District

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided September 29, 2022·No. 6:20-cv-00345·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MATTHEW JAMES SMITH; PAUL CALLEN; DARREN PARKER; LYNN WARNER; KATHY POWELL; ANN CORKERY; ALLAN D. CLACK; KEVIN CORKERY; and JBC RANCH PROPERTIES, LLC,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 6:20-cv-00345-MK

v. ORDER

TUMALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT; RONALD ALVARADO; and NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE,

Defendants. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 92), and the matter is now before this Court on Plaintiffs’ objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 92) is adopted in full. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 67) is DENIED and Defendant Tumalo Irrigation District’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 69) is GRANTED.

1 – ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 29th day of September, 2022.

___s/Michael J. McShane___________________ Michael McShane United States District Judge

2 – ORDER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Tumalo Irrigation District, (D. Or. 2022).

Smith v. Tumalo Irrigation District (Smith v. Tumalo Irrigation District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related