Home/Supreme Court/Smith v. Stoneking

Smith v. Stoneking

489 U.S. 1062, 109 S. Ct. 1333
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 6, 1989
DocketNo. 88-802
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 489 U.S. 1062 (Smith v. Stoneking) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Stoneking, 489 U.S. 1062, 109 S. Ct. 1333 (1989).

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioners to consolidate this case with No. 88-1350, Smith v. Sowers, denied. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services, ante, p. 189.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Linder v. City of New York
263 F. Supp. 2d 585 (E.D. New York, 2003)
Seneway v. Canon McMillan School District
969 F. Supp. 325 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1997)
Callahan v. Lancaster-Lebanon Intermediate Unit 13
880 F. Supp. 319 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1994)
Jane Doe v. Taylor Independent School District, Mike Caplinger in His Official Capacities and Eddy Lankford in His Official and Individual Capacities
15 F.3d 443 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
Doe v. Taylor Independent School Dist.
Fifth Circuit, 1994
Doe v. Bd. of Educ. of Hononegah School Dist. 207
833 F. Supp. 1366 (N.D. Illinois, 1993)
Newkirk v. Sheers
834 F. Supp. 772 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1993)
Gates v. Unified School District No. 449 of Leavenworth County
996 F.2d 1035 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
Gina Gates v. Unified School District No. 449 Of Leavenworth County, Kansas
996 F.2d 1035 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
Jane Doe v. Taylor Independent School District, and Mike Caplinger and Eddy Lankford
975 F.2d 137 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
D.R., a Minor Child, by Her Parent and Natural Guardian, L.R., and L.R., Individually and in Her Own Right, No. 91-1136 v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical School, William Goode, James C. Bazzel, Martha Richino, Susan Peters, Bucks County Intermediate Unit No. 22, Christina Tuttle, Penn Ridge School District, Charles Fambro, Fred Freeman, James A. Gallagher, Brian Miller, Marc R. Ratcliffe, James M. Sperling, Lester Sutphin. L.H., Bucks County, Pennsylvania, No. 91-1137 v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical School, and William Goode and James C. Bazzel and Martha Richino and Susan Peters and James A. Gallagher and Brian Miller and Marc R. Ratcliffe and James M. Sperling and Lester Sutphin
972 F.2d 1364 (Third Circuit, 1992)
Dorothy J. v. Little Rock School District
794 F. Supp. 1405 (E.D. Arkansas, 1992)
G-69 v. Degnan
745 F. Supp. 254 (D. New Jersey, 1990)
DiLoreto v. Borough of Oaklyn
744 F. Supp. 610 (D. New Jersey, 1990)
Timothy Ryan v. Burlington County, New Jersey, and Burlington County, Harold Colburn, Jr., Michael J. Conda, Catherine A. Costa, Henry J. Metzger, Robert C. Shinn, Michael J. Hogan, and Burlington County Solicitor's Office, Defendants/third Party v. Maurice Scott, Third Party and John Bradman, Individually and Officially as Warden of Burlington County Jail, Defendants/third Party v. Maurice Scott, Third Party Appeal of Harold Colburn, Jr., Michael Conda, Catherine H. Costa, Henry J. Metzger and Robert C. Shinn, Jr
889 F.2d 1286 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Ryan v. Burlington County
889 F.2d 1286 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Kathleen Stoneking v. Bradford Area School District
882 F.2d 720 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Stoneking v. Bradford Area School District
882 F.2d 720 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Felger v. Larimer County Board of County Commissioners
776 P.2d 1169 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 U.S. 1062, 109 S. Ct. 1333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-stoneking-scotus-1989.