Smith v. State

264 S.W.2d 106
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 157 Tex. Crim. 637
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 27, 1954·No. No. 26795·Published

Opinion

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the unlawful possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale in Coryell County, a dry area, and his punishment was assessed at 90 days in jail and a fine of $250.

Under the Texas Liquor Control Act, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666-1 et seq., it is required that the state establish, either by proof or otherwise, that the alleged county was a dry area, within the meaning of said Act. The statement of facts and the record in this case fail'to reflect that the state met this requirement.

The evidence is therefore insufficient to sustain the conviction. Brigham v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 55, 225 S.W.2d 176; Davis v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 101, 231 S.W.2d 444; Hodges v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 511, 209 S.W.2d 611.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 264 S.W.2d 106 (Tex. 1954).

264 S.W.2d 106 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hodges v. State
209 S.W.2d 611 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1948)
Brigham v. State
225 S.W.2d 176 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1949)
Davis v. State
231 S.W.2d 444 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)