Brigham v. State

225 S.W.2d 176, 154 Tex. Crim. 55, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1337
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 7, 1949·No. No. 24533·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Upon an information charging the unlawful sale of whisky in Hunt County, a dry area, appellant was convicted and punishment assessed at thirty days in jail.

The state was under the burden of establishing, either by proof or otherwise, that Hunt County was a dry area within the meaning of the liquor control act. The statement of facts, as well as the record as a whole, fails to reflect that the state discharged that burden.

The evidence is therefore insufficient to sustain the conviction. Hodges v. State, 151 Tex. Cr. R. 516, 209 S. W. 2d 611.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brigham v. State, 225 S.W.2d 176, 154 Tex. Crim. 55, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1337 (Tex. 1949).

225 S.W.2d 176 (Brigham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
264 S.W.2d 106 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Davis v. State
255 S.W.2d 1011 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1953)
Fletcher v. State
229 S.W.2d 74 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)