Smith v. State

114 S.W.2d 1179

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 Tex. Crim. 273 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 23, 1938·No. No. 19445·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary; punishment is assessed at confinement in the State Penitentiary for two years.

This is a companion case to 114 S.W.2d 1178. The same appellant’s conviction was there sustained for cattle theft in an opin[1180]*1180ion this day handed down but not yet reported [in State report]. An examination of this record discloses that the same questions were presented and disposed of in the opinion rendered therein.

For the reasons there stated, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary; punishment is assessed at confinement in the State Penitentiary for two years.

For the reasons there stated, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Smith v. State, 114 S.W.2d 1179 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

114 S.W.2d 1179 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.